Showing posts with label pulse modulation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pulse modulation. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

More Dominator Deconstruction.

Another attempt at the rave hoover sound, this time from Wouter Snoei on the SC-Users list, probably the best so far and based on further research into the Alpha Juno 2. Here's the code,

(
SynthDef( "hoover", { |freq = 220, amp = 0.1, lgu = 0.1, lgd = 1, gate = 1|
var pwm, mix, env;

freq = freq.cpsmidi.lag(lgu,lgd).midicps;
freq = SinOsc.kr( { 2.9 rrand: 3.1 }!3, {2pi.rand}!3 ).exprange( 0.995, 1.005 ) * freq;
pwm = SinOsc.kr( {2.0 rrand: 4.0}!3 ).range(0.125,0.875);

// the saw/pulses
mix = (LFSaw.ar( freq * [0.25,0.5,1], 1 ).range(0,1)
* (1 - LFPulse.ar(freq * [0.5,1,2], 0, pwm))).sum * 0.1;

// the bass
mix = mix + LFPar.ar( freq * 0.25, 0, 0.1 );

// eq for extra sharpness
mix = BPeakEQ.ar( mix, 6000, 1, 3 );
mix = BPeakEQ.ar( mix, 3500, 1, 6 );

// kind of chorus
mix = mix + CombC.ar( mix.dup, 1/200,
SinOsc.kr( 3, [0.5pi, 1.5pi] ).range(1/300,1/200),
0.0 ) * 0.5;

env = EnvGen.kr( Env.asr, gate );

Out.ar( 0, mix * env * amp );
}).store;
)

(
p = Pmono(\hoover,
\dur, Pseq([0.25,0.5,7, 0.25]* 0.24, inf),
\lgu, 0.15,
\lgd, Pseq([ 0.1, 0.1, 1.5, 0.25], inf ),
\midinote, Pseq([20, 67, 62, 20] , inf)).play;
)
p.stop;

(
p = Pmono(\hoover, \dur, 0.24,
\lgu, 0.2,
\lgd, Pseq([1,1,2,0.5,2,2,2,2], inf ),
\midinote, Pseq([55, 40, 67, 55, 40, 55, 53, 52], inf)).play;
)
p.stop;


Wouter's come up with a more accurate version of the pulse width modulation, certainly more accurate than my complete guess work and it sounds great.

Here's a little line of code taken from Wouter's post that may offer a bit of an explaination of what's going on with the modulation.

{ LFSaw.ar( 200, 1 ).range(0,1) * (1-LFPulse.ar( 400, 0, 2/3 )) }.plot;

If you run it you should get this plot,



You can see the waveform is a sort of flattened saw wave, this might explain why Dan had trouble identifying what it was.

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Deconstructing the Dominator

Dan's got a post over on his blog about reverse engineering the "hoover sound' found in the old school rave classic Dominator by Human Resource. He took a pretty technical approach and did various forms of analysis to come up with something that sound pretty good.
I thought I'd have a go myself, but I decided to take a more direct approach and look it up. I found this wikipedia article about it, it turns out that Human Resource were using a Roland Alpha Juno 2 to create that sound, a mid 80's digital/analogue hybrid synth. There's a good explanation of it's features here, importantly though, it does have a chorus unit built in, which Dan did identify as being the key feature of the sound.

Here's my re-construction attempt, I did start out to try and recreate the functions of an Alpha Juno 2, but in the end I mostly just improvised.

(
SynthDef(\aj2, {
arg freq = 440, gate = 1, lagLev = 0.01, predelay=0.01, speed=0.05, depth=0.01, ph_diff=0.5;
var width1, width2, width3, osc1, osc2, osc3, filterOut, mix, sig, modulators, numDelays = 8, lfo;
width1 = SinOsc.ar(4, 0, 0.8, 0.2).abs;
width2 = SinOsc.ar(6, 0, 0.8, 0.2).abs;
width3 = SinOsc.ar(2, 0, 0.8, 0.2).abs;
lfo = SinOsc.kr(5, 0, 5);
osc1 = Pulse.ar(Lag.kr(freq + lfo), width1);
osc2 = Pulse.ar(Lag.kr((freq/2) + lfo), 0.5);
osc3 = Pulse.ar(Lag.kr((freq*2) + lfo), width3);
mix = Mix.new([osc1, osc2, osc3]);
modulators = Array.fill(numDelays, {arg i;
       SinOsc.kr(speed * rrand(0.94, 1.06), ph_diff * i, depth, predelay);}); 
sig = DelayC.ar(mix, 0.5, modulators);  
sig = sig.sum;
Out.ar(0, sig.dup)
}).store
)

p = Pmono(\aj2, \dur, 0.24, \midinote, Pseq([40, 67, 64, 62, 62, 62, 62, 62], inf)).play;



I've got three pulse width modulated square wave oscillators here, modulated with low frequency SinOscs and some vibrato added with another low frequency SinOsc. These are put through a chorus efect taken from the ixi-audio.com tutorial, featured here before.

My patch is mostly based on random guesswork and a little bit of research, but it sounds okay, though probably not as good as Dan's scientific attempt.